Intel 45 nm Processor Technology for Mobile Products
Those of you that keep an eye on the
Intel Technology Journal have probably seen the write up on their
45 nm Processor Technology. For those that didn’t ,
I’ll summarize some of the key points here.
The 45 nm process incorporates
high-K+metal gate (HiK+MG) transistors for the first time along
with third generation strained silicon, nine copper interconnect
layers, 193nm dry patterning, and 100% Pb-free packaging. The
electrical performance of these products were covered in an IEDM
paper last year [ref].
[ref] K. Mistry et al., “A
45nm logic technology with high K+Metal gate transistors, Strained
Silicon, 9 Cu Interconnect layers, 193nm dry patterning and 100%
Pb-free packaging.” IEDM Technical Digest, 2007, pp.
247–250
The structure of the flip chip BGA
package is shown in the figure below.
![]()
The 100% Pb-free architecture was
achieved in a phased approach. Cu bumps were incorporated as part
of the 65nm process technology in place of the more compliant high
Pb-bumps on the silicon die. This was followed by
tin-silver-copper (SAC) solder in place of eutectic Pb-Sn,
as part of the 45nm technology.
Based on over five years of research
experience on Pb-free materials, Intel selected Sn-Ag-Cu
solder metallurgy as the flip-chip die attachment material. They
found that Sn-Ag-Cu solders have better wettability to
metal pads, leading to reduced solder voiding and reduced solder
joint open yield loss. They also possess increased solder joint
strength due to the suppression of under-bump nickel barrier layer
diffusion and intermetallic growth.
Both the Cu-bumps and the
SAC solder are much stiffer than their leaded counterparts and
impart significantly higher thermomechanical stress on the
mechanically-weak, low-K materials on the silicon die. The use of a
higher number of low-k-based metal layers in the 45nm
products for improved interconnect performance further exacerbates
the stress-management challenge. Assembly challenges included ILD
cracking and occasional solder joint interfacial delamination.
These challenges were resolved by “… an optimization
of far backend architecture, design, materials, and processes in
both fab and assembly”.
The change to lead-free (Pb-free)
solder alloys also necessitated the development of alternate flux
materials to clean off the more tenacious tin oxides from the
solder surface. The new flux material had to be stable at high
process temperatures and show strong adhesion between the
underfill, the bump metallurgy, and the die passivation.
As a side benefit, Intel found that
the Pb free technology provides significantly better
electromigration performance and power distribution performance
than typical Pb based joints , as shown below.
![]()
In order to meet the size
requirements of ultra mobile devices, the physical size of the 45nm
packaging technology had to scale down.
Overall package height in mobile
devices need to be less than 1mm. In order to achieve significant
package height reduction Intel developed a high volume
manufacturing process for wafer thinning 12-inch, high-density
bumped wafers down to 75um. In the case of the organic substrate, a
standard build-up core of ~800um is used for typical packages. By
wafer thinning and reducing the build-up core thickness, Intel
developed the capability to produce flip-chip packages with heights
that are 33% less than standard packages.
Scaling down the size of these
packages requires the board-level interconnect to scale as well. In
the case of the 45 nm processor technology, the ball pitch scaled
down to 0.6mm from what was previously 0.8 to 1.27mm pitch.
Mechanically drilled vias do not
scale well and limit the package ball pitch to approximately 0.8mm.
Thus, for 45 nm interconnect Intel was required to use High Density
Interconnect (HDI) motherboards shown in the Fig below. The laser
drilled microvias are significantly smaller than the mechanically
drilled vias and allow the signals to break out from the
package.
![]()
Stay linked to Perspectives From the Leading
Edge………………………………………….
guest commented:
Doesn't silver add cost to the packaging?

















