SI CHINA     SI JAPAN
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

'Big Four' Talking 450 With Tool Vendors

David Lammers, News Editor -- Semiconductor International, 10/30/2007 8:06:00 AM

Proponents of the 450 mm wafer generation said they are in discussions with equipment vendors to create a business model that will entice toolmakers to put their own skin in the high stakes 450 mm wafer game.

Tom Abell, 450 mm program manager at the International Sematech Manufacturing Initiative (ISMI, Austin, Texas) and an Intel (Santa Clara, Calif.) assignee to the 16-member ISMI consortium, said the four largest chip companies in support of the 450 mm standard — Intel Corp., Samsung Electronics Co., Toshiba Corp. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp. (TSMC, Hsinchu, Taiwan) — are in discussions with equipment suppliers about ways to create a consortia-like approach to 450 mm equipment development.

In the third quarter of this year, according to IC Insights (Scottsdale, Ariz.), those four IC makers accounted for ~$21B in chip revenues, out of ~$35B total in the quarter. Despite that clout, the largest equipment vendors, including Applied Materials Inc. (Santa Clara, Calif.), have largely opposed the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) call for insertion of the 450 mm wafers starting in 2012.

Tom Abell, ISMI 450 mm program manager
Abell said he understands the views of the equipment suppliers, who suffered through a major downturn just when 300 mm purchases were expected to blossom. “We understand that it takes very large amounts of money to develop a new generation of equipment. The investments are daunting, and in the 300 mm generation, they were left facing the pain when supplier contracts were cancelled and the 300 mm investments were so drawn out,” Abell said in an interview at the ISMI Symposium on Manufacturing Effectiveness, held in Austin last week.

For the 450 mm generation, “A third way needs to be developed. The devicemakers are looking at the cost model and trying to figure out, ‘How can we provide support?’ Discussions are occurring, talks about risk sharing. There are a number of ways that we could do it,” Abell said.

“We need to maintain close links with the suppliers so there are no mixed signals,” he said. By working together, the industry can get “the most efficient use of its R&D, in a forward-compatible approach, so both the devicemakers and the suppliers receive benefits. Otherwise, the economics of it don’t work out,” Abell said.

Wafer thickness standard important

For the 450 mm programs, standards for the wafer carriers are a top priority. Improved standards are needed for the shipping carriers, which bring the 450 mm wafers from the silicon wafer manufacturers to the fabs.

“We need all-automated handling from the shippers to the carriers, as the wafers come into shipping and receiving. The transfer into the FOUP has to happen in an automated fashion,” Abell said.

A standard for the thickness of the 450 mm wafers is needed soon, partly because the thickness determines the design of the front-opening universal pods (FOUPs) and other wafer-handling and storage standards.

“A whole set of things follow from the thickness,” Abell told the ISMI symposium participants.

Mike Goldstein, an Intel material scientist working on 450 mm wafer development, said if the proposed 825 µm thickness for the 450 mm wafer standard remains in place, it would result in unacceptable levels of sag. Goldstein said he is proposing a 925 µm thickness, a significant increase from the 775 µm thickness used for the 300 mm wafers.

“If it is too thick, the wafers become too expensive and too heavy,” he said. A 925-µm-thick wafer would weigh about 340 grams, he estimated, noting that a pound equals 440 grams.

The major silicon vendors working on 450 mm development have created “nice crystals up to 300 kg,” he said, adding that the production-use ingots will weigh in the range of 700-800 kg.

“There are a lot of challenges at this point. The biggest is how to create a perfect crystal,” Goldstein said.

Wafer test bed needed

ISMI plans to build a wafer-handling test bed next year involving companies making the FOUPs, robotics, wafer handlers, track and other companies involved in wafer handling, he said. ISMI is considering building a test piece of mainframe process equipment, with the standard equipment front-end modules (EFEM) interface, said Joe Draina, associate director of ISMI and an IBM Corp. (Yorktown Heights, N.Y.) assignee to the consortium.

The test bed will use sintered silicon wafers, made from a silicon powder that is placed under pressure, then sliced into the same shape, thickness and weight as the later single-crystal wafers.

“The sintered wafers will have very similar optical and mechanical properties to the single crystal wafers, but at a cost that is significantly lower,” Abell said, adding that he expects the major silicon wafer manufacturers to deliver single-crystal silicon by the second half of next year.

The wafer-handling test bed is needed to overcome problems that became clear in the development of the 300 mm generation. Then, standards were developed, but the physical testing was insufficient to ensure that each FOUP manufacturer, for example, created interoperable boxes.

“We need to make sure that each FOUP handles the wafer the same way,” Abell said, with FOUPs from different manufacturers able to enter every load port, with full interoperability.

“With the 300 mm generation, we set the standards too early and then changed them later,” he added.

One goal of the wafer-handling test bed will be improved automation, with automated ability to open the FOUP, remove the wafer and manipulate the wafer into a piece of equipment. “Eventually, we want to orient the robot to return the wafer into the FOUP, but not necessarily the same FOUP or the same slot,” he said.

At the upcoming SEMICON Japan show planned for Dec. 5-7, discussions will continue about how the 450 mm handlers can best meet the needs of both the low- and high-mix manufacturers (i.e., those with many diverse products running through the fab vs. those that run in higher volumes).

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

SPONSORED LINKS



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Videos

Blogs

Videos

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Plug in and get the latest SI news, trends and industry updates delivered free, directly to your inbox!

SI NewsBreak and Special Reports (Weekdays)
Wafer Processing Report (Monthly)
Lithography Report (Monthly)
Metrology Report (Monthly)
Clean Processing Report (Monthly)
Packaging Report (Twice Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites