SI CHINA     SI JAPAN
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Critical Tailoring of Clean Processing

Peter Singer, Editor-in-Chief -- Semiconductor International, 6/15/2006

Sidebars:
Clean Processing Executive Viewpoints

The most prevalent and most critical of all semiconductor manufacturing process steps is wafer cleaning. Over the years, it has evolved to a point where not only must most cleans be specifically tailored to the preceding or subsequent fabrication step (i.e., pre- or post-cleans), but to a level of sophistication that is better labeled as surface preparation or surface engineering. Not only must contamination be removed, but also the clean processing must be damage-free, corrosion-free and highly selective with minimal material loss. Add to that the influx of a vast array of new materials — many in production with many more in research — as well as the trend to smaller, more complex features and you have the makings of one of the most dynamic technologies in the industry.

Perhaps surprisingly, though, a technology developed in the '60s — a two-step wet clean best known as the RCA clean — has proved amazingly resilient and it, or at least a modified version of it, is still in wide use today. Wet cleaning/surface preparation has in general proved to be the technique of choice. Concerns that it would be difficult to impossible for any water/chemicals to get in and out of increasingly narrow features with higher aspect ratios have, at least so far, proved to be groundless. A vast amount of research has been done to develop alternatives, including concepts that include dry cleaning in a high-vacuum environment, supercritical cleans (which require a fairly high pressure), laser shock cleaning and cryogenic aerosol jet cleaning. Despite some dramatic successes, however, the industry still remains largely married to wet cleaning. In part, this is because wet cleaning has continued to mature and evolve with the introduction of new technologies, such as the use of dilute chemistries, ozonation, megasonics and single-wafer cleaning. As noted in the latest International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), "Wet chemical critical cleaning is still favored because many inherent properties of liquid solutions facilitate the removal of metals (high solubility in liquid chemistries) and particles (zeta-potential control, shear stress and efficient energy transfer by megasonics). The need for other techniques will arise, however, to provide interfacial control for advanced gates as well as non-etching, damage-free particle removal."1 Continued success will depend on how well existing technologies meet the needs of new materials, such as high- and low-k dielectrics, metal gates, epitaxial SiGe, etc., and increasingly small and fragile structures like that found in the finFET.

New cleaning techniques, such as water aerosol and cryogenic aerosol, have been implemented in manufacturing as single-wafer systems. Other techniques for cleaning, such as laser and supercritical CO2 (SCCO2) processes, are experiencing a high level of R&D and, if implemented, most likely will be on a single-wafer system. However, the barriers for acceptance of these techniques are high, because solutions for cleaning already exist. Chemistries used for cleaning will continue to evolve. Dilute chemistries, especially RCA cleans, have shown feasibility and are used in production. Because they can lead to less attack of the oxide and silicon surfaces, dilute chemistries have gained greater acceptance in most advanced fabs. Ozonated water processes are being implemented as replacements for some sulfuric acid-based resist strips and post-cleans. The use of ozonated water does reduce the use of chemicals and water; however, the implementation is not widespread because of the slow processing times and potential for corrosion. In addition, new resist formulations for 193 nm lithography may pose challenges for ozonated water resist stripping, as well as for sulfuric acid-based resist stripping.

Potential solutions are only indicated for the near-term years (through 2009), as it is unclear what challenges will exist for surface preparation at the 22 nm technology generation. As in the past, it is expected that current and future surface preparation processes will be the subject of continuous improvement efforts.1 The utilization of SCCO2-based technology in wafer cleaning presents a number of advantages, including excellent mass-transfer phenomena (lack of surface tension) and enhanced ultralow-k compatibilities. Organic solvents or proprietary chemical blends are frequently used as modifiers to improve cleaning performance.

Successful back-end-of-line supercritical cleans of 90 and 65 nm wafers using both bench-top and 300 mm tools have already been conducted. Although the implementation of this new technology is expected to be further delayed, its unique properties and capabilities continue to draw interest for cleaning applications in future technology nodes.2


ISMI Supplier EHS Leadership Forum:
Catalyzing EHS Improvements for the Next-Generation Wafer


July 13, 2006
9 a.m.-1 p.m.
San Francisco Marriott
Meeting leaders:
James Beasley, Intel assignee to Sematech
Rick Row, senior project manager, EHS Division, SEMI
Description:
The Supplier EHS Leadership activity within the International Sematech Manufacturing Initiative (ISMI) has the mission of encouraging tangible EHS improvement through integration and awareness of end-user EHS requirements into semiconductor equipment development and deployment. Opportunities for any process improvements in fabs, including EHS-related ones, are greatest prior to the conversion to the next-generation wafer (NGW). The goal of this forum will be for the participants to work collaboratively to prioritize EHS improvement opportunities to be addressed in the NGW based on economic, technical and regulatory criteria. In addition, the forum will recommend industry-wide actions to catalyze the desired improvements, such as new standards, collaborative R&D programs, technology diffusion, guidelines and industry education. A starting point for identifying the best possibilities is the lessons learned from the industry's last conversion from 200 to 300 mm wafers. For example, to what extent were energy efficiency, serviceability and design for maintenance, and overall resource efficiency — three priority issues identified at our 2005 ISMI Supplier EHS Leadership forum — advanced and what opportunities remain? ISMI plans to release a report based on the work of this meeting.
Agenda:
9-9:10 a.m. Introductions and overview
James Beasley, Intel assignee to ISMI
9:10-9:20 a.m.A device manufacturer's perspective
Mark Harralson, Intel
9:20-9:30 a.m.A semiconductor equipment manufacturer's perspective
Edward Karl, Applied Materials
9:30-9.40 a.m.A third-party perspective
Sunny Rai, Global Semiconductor
Safety Services
9:40-9:50 a.m.A global industry perspective
Nathan Rucker, Sagittal Systems
9:50-10:30 a.m.Breakout into groups
All attendees and presenters
10:30-11 a.m.Break
11-11:40 a.m.Report output from groups/Q&A
Group spokespeople
11:40-11:50 a.m.Consolidation of group outputs
Rick Row, SEMI
11:50 a.m.-12 p.m.Summary and next steps
James Beasley, Intel
12-1 p.m.Lunch (provided by ISMI)
Who should attend:
· Individuals from Sematech member companies who are familiar with the performance (technical, economic and EHS) of semiconductor equipment in their fabs and can influence next-generation design requirements.
· Individuals from SEMI member companies who develop, design, build, start up or service semiconductor equipment.
· EHS managers from Sematech member companies and SEMI member companies, with responsibilities related to equipment EHS performance.
Attendance by invitation only:
Selected individuals from Sematech member companies and SEMI member companies will be invited to the forum.
This will be a working meeting, and attendees will be asked to complete a one-page form to summarize their organization's EHS learnings from their 200 to 300 mm conversion prior to the meeting.

Particle Counting Hosted by Particle Measuring Systems
July 11-12
San Francisco Marriott
This educational presentation on particle counting will feature engineers from Particle Measuring Systems knowledgeable in the field of microcontamination. Eight presentations per day will be given to address topics of interest to those in the industry, with a repeating schedule presented on Wednesday. Registration is required: www.pmeasuring.com/support/semiconwest/registration
Presentation Schedule (Tuesday, July 11):
9 a.m. How to Select an Aerosol Particle Counter (repeated 2 p.m. Wed.)
10 a.m. Airborne-Partice Counter Calibration (repeated 1 p.m. Wed.)
11 a.m. New Techniques and Improvements for AMC Air Sample Analysis (repeated 3 p.m. Wed.)
12 p.m. Monitoring Molecular Contamination Inside Reticle and Wafer Carriers (repeated 4 p.m. Wed.)
1 p.m. Roadmap to the Future (repeated 5 p.m. Wed.)
2 p.m. Importance of Statistics for Liquid Particle Counters (repeated 12 p.m. Wed.)
3 p.m. Liquid Particle Counter Calibration (repeated 11 a.m. Wed.)
4 p.m. How to Ascertain Particle Counter Performance for Ultrapure Water and Liquid Chemicals (repeated 10 a.m. Wed.)
5 p.m. How Clean is Clean? Various Applications of Part Cleanliness Testing (repeated 9 a.m. Wed.)


References
  1. 2005 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS). Available at http://public.itrs.net.
  2. C.P.S. Hsu et al., "Cleaning Options for Copper/Ultralow-k Structures ," Semiconductor International , December 2005.
 

Clean Processing Executive Viewpoints

Kurt Lackenbucher, Executive Vice President & COO, The SEZ Group

The semiconductor industry is becoming more predictable, with less deviation among various forecasts. As semiconductors have truly become part of everyday life, expectations regarding demand cycles have become more realistic, lessening the likelihood of future "bubbles." This enables better visibility into future performance.

Moreover, because the industry has matured, companies are reluctant to adapt their proven manufacturing strategies to accommodate new tools and processes, so there will be fewer early adopters. Innovation must therefore become more pragmatic, based on close collaboration between suppliers and customers. Technology must be accompanied by such differentiators as global service and support, cost engineering, and design for manufacturing methodologies.

With this added clarity comes further perspective on the escalating demand for single-wafer cleaning. The main industry driver for this year is the transition to 65 nm processing, with 45 nm pilot lines emerging as well. Single-wafer cleaning is not only necessary for 65 nm and below, but is also becoming critically important for reducing cycle times and increasing productivity in both front- and back-end-of-line processes, where the expected introduction of new materials such as metal gates and high-k dielectrics, together with more stringent cleanliness, selectivity and damage-control requirements, are forcing the industry to move away from the traditional approach of batch processing.

In addition to higher-end markets, we're also seeing an increase in the demand for single-wafer wet processing in less critical, highly cost-sensitive markets, such as semiconductor packaging — an area that's exhibiting some of the most aggressive growth in the electronics industry. Essentially, the entire landscape is changing, as more attention is drawn to single-wafer wet processing, and wet bench/spray technologies continue to recede from the market.

Don Mitchell, Chairman & CEO, FSI International

For several decades each new generation of technology accomplished its performance gains mainly through classical scaling. Now that the industry has moved beyond 130 nm, classical scaling is no longer sufficient. According to Bernie Meyerson, IBM Systems and Technology fellow, VP, and chief technologist, 60-70% of performance gains are now achieved through material and design innovations. With this higher level of innovation, FSI has had to change how we approach the development and integration of next-generation surface conditioning.

During the period of classical scaling, surface preparation challenges were dominated by producing cleaner surfaces (i.e., fewer and smaller particulate contamination and lower metallic contamination). In today's period of innovation, surface preparation plays a more significant role in device formation and performance. In addition to the traditional contamination reduction requirements, surface preparation processes must achieve highly selective thin-film removal, low-etch resist strip and precision thin etching. The future use of advanced high-k/metal gate stacks and multi-gate transistors will drive more challenges in high selectivity and damage-free surface preparation — requiring even more development partnerships between the equipment supplier and IC manufacturer.

Development activities can start in the equipment supplier's facility, but must be completed through integration activities in the customer's fab, with the supplier experts working as part of the IC maker's virtual work force.

Find more information on clean processing.
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

SPONSORED LINKS



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Videos

Blogs

  • David Lammers
    Views on News

    May 6, 2008
    The Other 450 mm Shoe
    The three companies openly pushing for 450 mm wafers are working on a plan to subsidize the equipmen...
    More
  • David Lammers
    Views on News

    April 9, 2008
    The Donut Mystery
    John Halladay, a clean process manager at Spansion’s Fab 25, brought a good mystery to Sematec...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Videos

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Plug in and get the latest SI news, trends and industry updates delivered free, directly to your inbox!

SI NewsBreak and Special Reports (Weekdays)
Wafer Processing Report (Monthly)
Lithography Report (Monthly)
Metrology Report (Monthly)
Clean Processing Report (Monthly)
Packaging Report (Twice Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites