Critical Tailoring of Clean Processing
Peter Singer, Editor-in-Chief -- Semiconductor International, 6/15/2006
|
The most prevalent and most critical of all semiconductor manufacturing process steps is wafer cleaning. Over the years, it has evolved to a point where not only must most cleans be specifically tailored to the preceding or subsequent fabrication step (i.e., pre- or post-cleans), but to a level of sophistication that is better labeled as surface preparation or surface engineering. Not only must contamination be removed, but also the clean processing must be damage-free, corrosion-free and highly selective with minimal material loss. Add to that the influx of a vast array of new materials — many in production with many more in research — as well as the trend to smaller, more complex features and you have the makings of one of the most dynamic technologies in the industry.
Perhaps surprisingly, though, a technology developed in the '60s — a two-step wet clean best known as the RCA clean — has proved amazingly resilient and it, or at least a modified version of it, is still in wide use today. Wet cleaning/surface preparation has in general proved to be the technique of choice. Concerns that it would be difficult to impossible for any water/chemicals to get in and out of increasingly narrow features with higher aspect ratios have, at least so far, proved to be groundless. A vast amount of research has been done to develop alternatives, including concepts that include dry cleaning in a high-vacuum environment, supercritical cleans (which require a fairly high pressure), laser shock cleaning and cryogenic aerosol jet cleaning. Despite some dramatic successes, however, the industry still remains largely married to wet cleaning. In part, this is because wet cleaning has continued to mature and evolve with the introduction of new technologies, such as the use of dilute chemistries, ozonation, megasonics and single-wafer cleaning. As noted in the latest International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), "Wet chemical critical cleaning is still favored because many inherent properties of liquid solutions facilitate the removal of metals (high solubility in liquid chemistries) and particles (zeta-potential control, shear stress and efficient energy transfer by megasonics). The need for other techniques will arise, however, to provide interfacial control for advanced gates as well as non-etching, damage-free particle removal."1 Continued success will depend on how well existing technologies meet the needs of new materials, such as high- and low-k dielectrics, metal gates, epitaxial SiGe, etc., and increasingly small and fragile structures like that found in the finFET.
New cleaning techniques, such as water aerosol and cryogenic aerosol, have been implemented in manufacturing as single-wafer systems. Other techniques for cleaning, such as laser and supercritical CO2 (SCCO2) processes, are experiencing a high level of R&D and, if implemented, most likely will be on a single-wafer system. However, the barriers for acceptance of these techniques are high, because solutions for cleaning already exist. Chemistries used for cleaning will continue to evolve. Dilute chemistries, especially RCA cleans, have shown feasibility and are used in production. Because they can lead to less attack of the oxide and silicon surfaces, dilute chemistries have gained greater acceptance in most advanced fabs. Ozonated water processes are being implemented as replacements for some sulfuric acid-based resist strips and post-cleans. The use of ozonated water does reduce the use of chemicals and water; however, the implementation is not widespread because of the slow processing times and potential for corrosion. In addition, new resist formulations for 193 nm lithography may pose challenges for ozonated water resist stripping, as well as for sulfuric acid-based resist stripping.
Potential solutions are only indicated for the near-term years (through 2009), as it is unclear what challenges will exist for surface preparation at the 22 nm technology generation. As in the past, it is expected that current and future surface preparation processes will be the subject of continuous improvement efforts.1 The utilization of SCCO2-based technology in wafer cleaning presents a number of advantages, including excellent mass-transfer phenomena (lack of surface tension) and enhanced ultralow-k compatibilities. Organic solvents or proprietary chemical blends are frequently used as modifiers to improve cleaning performance.
Successful back-end-of-line supercritical cleans of 90 and 65 nm wafers using both bench-top and 300 mm tools have already been conducted. Although the implementation of this new technology is expected to be further delayed, its unique properties and capabilities continue to draw interest for cleaning applications in future technology nodes.2
| ISMI Supplier EHS Leadership Forum: Catalyzing EHS Improvements for the Next-Generation Wafer July 13, 2006 |
|
| 9 a.m.-1 p.m. | |
| San Francisco Marriott | |
| Meeting leaders: | |
| James Beasley, Intel assignee to Sematech | |
| Rick Row, senior project manager, EHS Division, SEMI | |
| Description: | |
| The Supplier EHS Leadership activity within the International Sematech Manufacturing Initiative (ISMI) has the mission of encouraging tangible EHS improvement through integration and awareness of end-user EHS requirements into semiconductor equipment development and deployment. Opportunities for any process improvements in fabs, including EHS-related ones, are greatest prior to the conversion to the next-generation wafer (NGW). The goal of this forum will be for the participants to work collaboratively to prioritize EHS improvement opportunities to be addressed in the NGW based on economic, technical and regulatory criteria. In addition, the forum will recommend industry-wide actions to catalyze the desired improvements, such as new standards, collaborative R&D programs, technology diffusion, guidelines and industry education. A starting point for identifying the best possibilities is the lessons learned from the industry's last conversion from 200 to 300 mm wafers. For example, to what extent were energy efficiency, serviceability and design for maintenance, and overall resource efficiency — three priority issues identified at our 2005 ISMI Supplier EHS Leadership forum — advanced and what opportunities remain? ISMI plans to release a report based on the work of this meeting. | |
| Agenda: | |
| 9-9:10 a.m. | Introductions and overview |
| James Beasley, Intel assignee to ISMI | |
| 9:10-9:20 a.m. | A device manufacturer's perspective |
| Mark Harralson, Intel | |
| 9:20-9:30 a.m. | A semiconductor equipment manufacturer's perspective |
| Edward Karl, Applied Materials | |
| 9:30-9.40 a.m. | A third-party perspective |
| Sunny Rai, Global Semiconductor | |
| Safety Services | |
| 9:40-9:50 a.m. | A global industry perspective |
| Nathan Rucker, Sagittal Systems | |
| 9:50-10:30 a.m. | Breakout into groups |
| All attendees and presenters | |
| 10:30-11 a.m. | Break |
| 11-11:40 a.m. | Report output from groups/Q&A |
| Group spokespeople | |
| 11:40-11:50 a.m. | Consolidation of group outputs |
| Rick Row, SEMI | |
| 11:50 a.m.-12 p.m. | Summary and next steps |
| James Beasley, Intel | |
| 12-1 p.m. | Lunch (provided by ISMI) |
| Who should attend: | |
| · Individuals from Sematech member companies who are familiar with the performance (technical, economic and EHS) of semiconductor equipment in their fabs and can influence next-generation design requirements. | |
| · Individuals from SEMI member companies who develop, design, build, start up or service semiconductor equipment. | |
| · EHS managers from Sematech member companies and SEMI member companies, with responsibilities related to equipment EHS performance. | |
| Attendance by invitation only: | |
| Selected individuals from Sematech member companies and SEMI member companies will be invited to the forum. | |
| This will be a working meeting, and attendees will be asked to complete a one-page form to summarize their organization's EHS learnings from their 200 to 300 mm conversion prior to the meeting. | |
| July 11-12 | |
| San Francisco Marriott | |
| This educational presentation on particle counting will feature engineers from Particle Measuring Systems knowledgeable in the field of microcontamination. Eight presentations per day will be given to address topics of interest to those in the industry, with a repeating schedule presented on Wednesday. Registration is required: www.pmeasuring.com/support/semiconwest/registration | |
| Presentation Schedule (Tuesday, July 11): | |
| 9 a.m. | How to Select an Aerosol Particle Counter (repeated 2 p.m. Wed.) |
| 10 a.m. | Airborne-Partice Counter Calibration (repeated 1 p.m. Wed.) |
| 11 a.m. | New Techniques and Improvements for AMC Air Sample Analysis (repeated 3 p.m. Wed.) |
| 12 p.m. | Monitoring Molecular Contamination Inside Reticle and Wafer Carriers (repeated 4 p.m. Wed.) |
| 1 p.m. | Roadmap to the Future (repeated 5 p.m. Wed.) |
| 2 p.m. | Importance of Statistics for Liquid Particle Counters (repeated 12 p.m. Wed.) |
| 3 p.m. | Liquid Particle Counter Calibration (repeated 11 a.m. Wed.) |
| 4 p.m. | How to Ascertain Particle Counter Performance for Ultrapure Water and Liquid Chemicals (repeated 10 a.m. Wed.) |
| 5 p.m. | How Clean is Clean? Various Applications of Part Cleanliness Testing (repeated 9 a.m. Wed.) |
| References |
|

