SI CHINA     SI JAPAN
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Letter to the Editor

Staff -- Semiconductor International, 9/1/2003

At times I wish I had more business and history training to provide me the depth of knowledge to understand our current situation, but that of course doesn't stop me from having an opinion (see "Don't Fix the Guillotine ," Semiconductor International, June 2003).

We are in a relatively young industry, rapidly growing and maturing to the (irreconcilable?) tunes of the market and Moore's Law. All this, overlaid with an up-and-down global economy combined with a truly global manufacturing marketplace makes for a messy system to model. It's nice to imagine IC manufacturers and semiconductor equipment manufacturers increasing prices to rational (sustainable) levels, but typical market forces weigh against this happening. More likely, we will continue to witness a reduction in the number of IC and equipment manufacturers via merger, acquisition and bankruptcy until the venerable supply/demand model is satisfied. And it's gonna hurt, a lot of us.

A difficult part of the system to understand and accept is that the "marketplace" is truly global, with all the ramifications that implies. The playing field is not level, nor will it be in the foreseeable future. Differences in equity markets, governments, political environments, and cultures throughout the world mean that capital availability, ROI and profitability requirements are not uniform and drive business decisions counter to what many of us would like to see. Once again, many of us will be hurt in the short term as market forces drive toward the longer term.

IC manufacturing is not particularly different from other manufacturing industries; we would do well to recognize this rather than continue to blow the trumpet of high technology. We're in the same cycle that textiles, automobiles and many others are, just in an earlier phase. We are unique in many ways, but this has not exempted us from market imperatives and "the way of the world." My only thought for the future is that, individually and as an industry, we review our slavish adherence to Moore's Law and consider whether the market (the ultimate purveyors of our paychecks) wants what we can produce. Clearly, we can do it (stay on the roadmap), but should we?

Kevin McLaughlin
Strategic Account Manager
SCP Global Technologies

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

SPONSORED LINKS



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Videos

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Videos

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Plug in and get the latest SI news, trends and industry updates delivered free, directly to your inbox!

SI NewsBreak and Special Reports (Weekdays)
Wafer Processing Report (Monthly)
Lithography Report (Monthly)
Metrology Report (Monthly)
Clean Processing Report (Monthly)
Packaging Report (Twice Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites