SI CHINA     SI JAPAN
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Ballroom Cleanroom vs. Minienvironment

by Maria A. Lester, Associate Editor -- Semiconductor International, 4/1/2003

As technology used in the semiconductor industry advances, controlling contamination within a ballroom cleanroom environment becomes an increasingly difficult task. Until recently, there were not many options when choosing a cleanroom design. Within the last couple of years, minienvironments — in which a protective closure houses one process or tool instead of the entire production line — have become more predominant.

Minienvironments have even caught the attention of the Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology (IEST, Rolling Meadows, Ill.), which publishes a series of recommended practice protocols for contamination control in cleanrooms. In response to this emerging trend, IEST released a new Contamination Control Recommended Practice on Minienvironments, IEST-RP-CC028.1. The document provides a framework for describing minienvironments for microelectronics. It discusses applications, planning, design and evaluation in detail.

In retrospect, the obvious advantages of using a minienvironment over a ballroom cleanroom environment appear to include:

  • Controlling contamination within a single process is more efficient and provides better quality control than in a ballroom.
  • The production environment is isolated from pollutants, and especially from operators. Wafers enter and exit through automated pass-through between the interior of the minienvironment and the environmentally isolated pods that deliver and retrieve cassettes of wafers and transport them between other process stations. Perhaps the other process stations are also housed within minienvironments.
  • Enclosing all wafer processing and transporting tools within minienvironments reduces the requirements on air quality in the space surrounding the tools.

Perhaps the semiconductor manufacturing workforce will not need bunny suits and wafer-protecting gear in the future. Most likely there will be a place and purpose for each environment.

For additional information on clean processing, go to www.semiconductor.net/clean

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

There are no other articles written by this author.

SPONSORED LINKS



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Videos

Blogs

  • David Lammers
    Views on News

    May 6, 2008
    The Other 450 mm Shoe
    The three companies openly pushing for 450 mm wafers are working on a plan to subsidize the equipmen...
    More
  • David Lammers
    Views on News

    April 9, 2008
    The Donut Mystery
    John Halladay, a clean process manager at Spansion’s Fab 25, brought a good mystery to Sematec...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Videos

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Plug in and get the latest SI news, trends and industry updates delivered free, directly to your inbox!

SI NewsBreak and Special Reports (Weekdays)
Wafer Processing Report (Monthly)
Lithography Report (Monthly)
Metrology Report (Monthly)
Clean Processing Report (Monthly)
Packaging Report (Twice Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites