SI CHINA     SI JAPAN
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Ways of Addressing Interconnect-Level ESH Issues

Laura Peters -- Semiconductor International, 3/1/2002

With advanced VLSI devices come more metal levels, a variety of low-k dielectrics and greater use of chemicals, slurries and ultrapure water in an increasingly "wet" back-end-of-line that used to rely more heavily on dry processing. All of the new material changes, along with accelerated roadmaps, put a strain on engineers and managers who must address environment, safety and health (ESH) issues in the fab. The key lies in assessing and addressing all aspects of material use — from initial supply to waste stream management — before a new material is brought into production use.

Today's ESH issues pertain to the increasing use of wet chemical processes in electrochemical deposition (ECD), use of solvents in spin-on dielectric solutions, high volumes of slurry and cleaning chemistries in CMP, and the need to replenish, reuse or even recycle solvents, acids and ultrapure water. As new materials are rapidly brought into pilot and production lines, IC and chemical companies must quickly prepare so that ESH issues do not hinder a company's ability to ramp up new processes. According to the latest International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), the industry needs to develop environmentally friendly plating baths and solvents, devise methods of reusing or recycling ECD solutions and CMP slurries, and tighten process control and processes to approach zero waste in wet and dry processes.

Engineers need to consider not only the chemicals used in the process, for instance, but also the waste created by mixing process streams, interactions with equipment components and other chemicals, etc. With increasing levels of metal and the addition of new materials, efforts to optimize the treatment, process control and quantity of wet chemical processes used become important. In the area of dry processes, the industry continues to battle with the issue of PFC (perfluorocarbon) emissions from chamber cleaning and some deposition processes. If a PFC cannot be eliminated from a process, the alternative is to develop a zero-emission process that fully utilizes the gas.

Careful screening during the early stages of development is essential. Reaction product emissions, health and safety properties, materials compatibility with equipment and other chemical components, flammability and reactivity must be predetermined to ameliorate ESH impact. For more information, see the 2001 ITRS section on ESH. Also see "Advanced Gates Present New ESH Issues".

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

SPONSORED LINKS



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Videos

Blogs

  • David Lammers
    Views on News

    November 7, 2008
    Big Wafers, Big Prices
    Dean Freeman, the Gartner semiconductor equipment analyst, threw out a zinger when he came to Austin...
    More
  • David Lammers
    Views on News

    October 31, 2008
    Three Innovations to Watch
    Innovation is the fourth great economic input, along with labor, capital, and machines, and the hard...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Videos

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Plug in and get the latest SI news, trends and industry updates delivered free, directly to your inbox!

SI NewsBreak and Special Reports (Weekdays)
Wafer Processing Report (Monthly)
Lithography Report (Monthly)
Metrology Report (Monthly)
Clean Processing Report (Monthly)
Packaging Report (Twice Monthly)
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites