Tailoring Polymer Properties with Ion Beams
Nathan Capps, Dan Carter, Greg Roche, Advanced Energy Industries Inc., Fort Collins, Colo. -- Semiconductor International, 7/1/2000
| At a Glance | |||
| |||
Many polymer applications are limited by poor adhesion between a deposited material and the polymer surface. In any application where adhesion is critical, differences in chemical and physical surface characteristics between substrate and deposited film must be addressed. One application directly facing these challenges is the use of polymers as circuit boards with copper interconnect components. Increasing demand for smaller devices continues to drive circuit designs into the vertical dimension and raises concerns about electrical properties of both interconnect and insulating (substrate) materials. These demands spawn technologies aimed at achieving higher integration densities and meeting the novel challenges associated with multilevel metallization (MLM) schemes. Copper is attracting much attention as a possible solution to some material requirements. It is able to handle the high current densities necessitated by smaller device features and is a more suitable interconnect metal than aluminum. The ability to deposit quality copper films is currently the focus of much research, and numerous methods such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and plasma-assisted chemical vapor deposition (PA-CVD), among others, are being evaluated to optimize process characteristics and film quality.
Click for full size image |
| 1. Ion beams could improve adhesion on polymers by surface roughening or interfacial mixing. |
In addition to metal/polymer adhesion issues, examples abound of applications that would benefit directly from surface modification processes of polymers. In many biomedical applications, the mechanical behavior of a certain polymer may be very desirable, but its surface properties may render it incompatible with biological systems. A reliable surface modification process could make available entirely new applications for polymers and bring into feasibility numerous concepts previously fettered by adhesion and interface difficulties. These examples illustrate the need for a technology capable of achieving reliable, controllable surface modification of polymers.
Gridless ion sources offer a remarkable parameter space for surface treatments, including ion energies, fluxes and feed gas chemistries. Altering the physical and/or chemical surface properties could help enhance metallization, adhesion and other applications. This article offers a brief overview of this enabling technology and how it can address surface modification strategies beneficial to adhesion and polymer metalization.
Surface modification methods
Much research has been directed in recent years to investigate the surface modification of polymers. Different methods are being studied, ranging from traditional (wet-chemical) processes to plasma treatments to novel fabrication schemes, and there are benefits and drawbacks to each. Despite the enormous body of work on this topic, the search continues for a universal solution. The ideal surface treatment process would possess several characteristics. It should be specifically localized to the surface and not significantly affect the bulk properties of the polymer. Mechanical strength and thermal characteristics could then coexist with specifically tailored surface properties. The treatment technology should be able to introduce a wide range of physical and/or chemical changes to the surface, including surface texturing, microstructure formation, chemical functional group implantation, crosslinking or functional group abstraction. The technology should be capable of inducing these changes in short treatment times, enabling high throughput fabrication. Finally, the treatment should be flexible and accommodate the wide range of polymers likely to benefit by its use. This entails addressing the issues of substrate heating, contamination control and the efficiency of processes likely to scale up to production levels.
Ion beam treatments offer significant promise in meeting these requirements. In contrast to UV bombardment, which can cross-link polymer chains to significant depths and possibly alter bulk properties, ion beam treatments affect structures via a molecular and not radiative vehicle, thus confining their effect within certain atomic penetration and diffusion boundaries. In addition, there is an enormous selection of ion beam treatments capable of altering chemical and physical surface properties of polymers. Because of the wide application of plasma and ion beam treatments to semiconductors in recent years, many of these techniques have evolved into production-scale solutions. Therefore, the means already exist for integrating this technology into production applications for a variety of materials. Finally, ion beam treatments could be easily and effectively combined with traditional wet-chemical processes with capabilities of sophisticated chemical surface modification.
| Treatment technique | Method | Applications |
| Ultraviolet bombardment (UV lamps) |
Energetic photons cause cross-linking and free radical formation in polymers. | Limited utility for extensive surface modification. Alteration of bulk properties of polymer. Requires additional (2nd step) treatments. |
| RF plasma | Bombardment of polymer surfaces with energetic neutrals, ions, radicals, photons and electrons. | Surface modification achievable without altering bulk polymer properties. Non-directional nature affects throughput and treatment characteristics. Variety of surface modifications available. |
| Gridless ion sources | Bombardment of polymer surfaces with highly directional ions of variable energy. Selectable surface chemistries based on choice of process gas. | Localized surface modification. Directional nature, energetic species could give high process efficiencies. Wide range of surface modifications available. Easily combined with deposition techniques. |
Several plasma-based techniques have the capability for polymer surface modification, each with unique merits that justify its application to a particular process. Some of the most common methods are rf plasma treatment, corona discharges and ion beams. Table 1 illustrates some of the potential capabilities of these techniques. Of these methods, ion beam sources offer some of the most promising and attractive capabilities for adhesion improvement processes. Ion beams are capable of highly anisotropic etching because of the ion beam directionality. This characteristic could be applicable to precision etch applications, such as microelectric machine (MEM) fabrication. Ion beam technology has been proven to be scalable in high-volume industrial applications; it is commonly used in such applications as glass cleaning and implanting for tool and die materials. Associated with ion beam technology is a wide parameter space for adjustable ion energies, a critical factor in successful polymer treatment. Finally, broad-beam ion sources, with their ability to operate in reactive gases, offer the possibility of chemical as well as physical modification of a polymer surface.
Ion beams could improve adhesion on polymer surface by various mechanisms. Surface roughening (Fig. 1b) is one of the principal ways to improve adhesion of a coating, and has been a successful application of ion beam technology on various substrates and films, such as DLC and Al2O3 films to a variety of glass and ceramic substrates. Another technique beneficial to adhesion is interfacial mixing (Fig. 1c). In this process, energetic ions bombard a surface during a deposition process and cause mixing of substrate and coating on the atomic level. While commonly associated with very high ion energies used for inorganic interfaces, this technique also could be well suited to a polymer adhesion problem, since lower ion energies could produce interfacial mixing between polymer substrates and a metal coating. This use of broad-beam ion source technology for removal of a sharp boundary layer and the replacement with a small gradient layer holds great promise. Ion beams also can be used to introduce chemical functional groups on the surface that can lead to a greater affinity for a variety of materials, such as traditional adhesives, ceramics or metallic oxides. Finally, ion beams could be used in the formation of extended gradient interfaces between a substrate and a coating. This strategy represents perhaps the ultimate in adhesion improvement, with the total elimination of a distinct interface.
Click for full size image |
| 2. In a gridless ion source, ions are accelerated by the space charge field that runs perpendicular to the magnetic field. Since ions originate at different points along this space charge, the resulting ion beam has a broad ion energy distribution. |
Gridless ion sources (Fig. 2) are a unique technology capable of remarkable process variety and have many potential applications to polymer surface modification. These sources are an elegant solution to ion beam production and are rapidly increasing in popularity as new utilities for this technology are recognized. A magnetic field is formed in front of an anode; this restricts electron motion toward the anode and forms a space charge field. Electron collisions ionize feed gases dispersed through or about the anode. Ions originating within the plasma region are are repelled from the anode and accelerated by the space charge field that runs perpendicular to the magnetic field. Since ions originate at different points along this space charge, and therefore experience a different magnitude of repulsion, the resulting ion beam has a broad ion energy distribution.
Gridless ion sources often are referred to as "Hall-current" or "closed-drift" ion beam sources. Electrons confined within the magnetic field experience a Hall-effect force running parallel to the anode face, similar to a magnetron sputtering source. The anode is usually a ring, circular channel, cone or cylinder that allows the electrons to drift continuously around a closed-path plasma region.
| Process gas | Result | Benefit |
| Argon (Ar) |
|
|
| Oxygen (O2), Nitrogen (N2) |
|
|
| Hydrocarbons (CXHY) Butane (C4H10) Ethylene (C2H4) |
|
|
| Ion-beam assisted processes Ion bombardment during deposition process Argon (Ar) Reactive Gases (O2, N2, H2) |
|
|
Gridless ion sources offer significant benefits to numerous processes and process environments. These devices produce ion beams with high current densities and with a broad distribution of energies as well as a wide range of operation. Gridless sources can operate in vacuum pressures from 0.01 to 100 mTorr. This ability to operate at magnetron sputtering pressures allows their use in a variety of deposition processes. Sputter deposition of copper could be enhanced by the use of gridless ion sources, for example, operating with either reactive or nonreactive gases. Ion beams from gridless ion sources consist of a broad distribution of ion energies. These energies can range from nearly zero to the magnitude of the anode potential, with the highest number density centered about half the anode potential. This broad energy spectrum provides a gridless ion source with a unique level of flexibility to participate in cleaning, surface modification and deposition processes. The high current densities provided by this technology are attractive from an efficiency standpoint Table 2 lists various process options using gridless ion sources.
| 3. Untreated polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) surface. |
To illustrate the versatile nature of ion beam treatment of polymers, several experiments have been performed on a variety of substrates. As mentioned above, polymer surface roughening can be achieved with gridless ion source technology. Figure 3 is a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) image of the surface of untreated polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). While there are some surface features, this topology is typical of an untreated polymer surface.
| 4. PTFE surface after ion beam treatment. |
| 5. SEM cross-section image of PTFE surface after ion beam treatment. |
The previous example illustrates the capability of gridless ion sources to physically modify the polymer surfaces. As mentioned earlier, it is well known that roughening of surfaces will improve adhesion of a deposited film, and preliminary results suggest the adhesion of copper on acrylobutastyrene (ABS) polymer can be improved with ion beam treatment. Approximately 1 µm of copper was sputtered onto samples of ABS plastic that had been treated with an Ar ion beam to achieve surface roughening. Samples that had undergone ion beam pre-treatment showed no delamination and good adhesion when subjected to a tape test. Control samples performed in the same pumpdown cycles showed poor adhesion to the substrate and delaminated under a tape test. These results suggest the adhesion of copper onto polymeric materials can be greatly enhanced by the use of ion beam pre-treatment.
| 6. ABS surface after ion beam treatment. |
Surface modification mechanisms
| 7. Untreated ABS polymer surface. |
| 8. Cross-section image of sputtered copper/polymer interface. |
Conclusion
The wide variety of treatments available offer exciting new areas for research and development to conclusively identify and optimize both the method and effect of ion beam treatment. Gridless ion beam ion technology offers a wide parameter space for exploration, along with a field-proven reputation of reliable operation in fabrication environments, and likely may offer a viable solution to copper/polymer adhesions and other applications. •
Nathan E. Capps earned his M.S. in chemistry at Colorado State
University and his B.S. in chemistry at Florida State University. He is an
application development engineer working on film process development in the
Applications R&D Group at Advanced Energy Industries Inc. Dan Carter is applications manager at Advanced Energy Industries Inc.
He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in material science and engineering from Purdue
and Northwestern Universities, respectively. Prior to joining Advanced Energy,
he worked for 13 years in semiconductor fabrication. At Advanced Energy, his
primary focus is on applications of ion beam and ICP sources. Gregory A. Roche is director of the Applications R&D Group at
Advanced Energy Industries Inc. He holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from
the University of California, Irvine. Before joining Advanced Energy, he worked
for 20 years in semiconductor processing and semiconductor process equipment
design. His current work focuses on design and application of novel plasma
sources.Talkback
Related Content
Related Content
SPONSORED LINKS