SI CHINA     SI JAPAN
Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

AMD Employs ESD Control for Photomasks

Laura Peters, Senior Editor -- Semiconductor International, 6/1/2001

Advanced Micro Devices (AMD, Sunnyvale, Calif.) is successfully using an ESD (electrostatic discharge) service at its Fab 25 facility in Austin, Texas, aimed at reducing and preventing ESD damage to reticles and the associated yield loss. AMD began implementing the patent-pending service last October. The Canary audit-based ESD service was co-developed by DuPont Photomasks Inc. (DPI, Round Rock, Texas) and Ion Systems (Berkeley, Calif.). It is designed to raise wafer yields by preventing ESD events in photomask receiving, transport pods, stockers, steppers and scanners, and inspection stations.

As in most areas of wafer processing, with shrinking device features come increasingly vulnerable reticles because less energy is needed to cause an ESD event. When the reticle is close to a grounded surface, the charge flows to the chromium/ chromium oxide (chrome) mask. Damage can occur even without physical contact and at low levels of electrostatic exposure, resulting in yield loss, process downtime and high reticle replacement costs. If the industry eventually makes a transition to a 9 x 9 in. format from today's 6 x 6 in. standard, ESD reticle damage will become even more severe, as is already occurring with the transition to 300 mm wafers.

Quartz blanks, like plastic carriers and oxide-coated wafers, are excellent insulators, and thus readily charge and hold static electricity. Since these materials cannot be grounded in the fab, ionization is the best method available to neutralize the charge, which can exceed 10 kV. Even though static charge levels held by an object can be low (~10-9 C), they discharge rapidly in a small space (~0.1 µm3). Such an ESD event, often caused by proximity to insulating objects such as minienvironment pods, can melt or vaporize the chrome that defines submicron features on the reticle. The ESD signature looks like chipped or melted chrome on pattern edges or corners where the electric field concentrates. The chrome then separates from the quartz, becoming a potential contaminant for the reticle, pellicle and stepper. Chrome can also migrate from one line to another when the charge between the two differs.

In minor cases, the reticle can be repaired. But, ironically, even the act of transporting a reticle to an inspection station to look for ESD damage increases the static charge level on that reticle. The greatest yield loss results from a killer defect on the reticle that goes undetected. ESD is also an insidious problem because reticles suffer both from repeated, low-level ESD events that cause feature bridging, and from catastrophic events, which vaporize and remove the chrome.

In addition to reticle damage, static charge can cause stepper lock-up, a phenomenon that results from EMI (electromagnetic interference) generated by ESD. The ESD locks up microprocessors inside the tool, causing unpredictable forms of malfunction such as wafers missing the entry port to a chamber and crashing into the side.

The ESD service combines proprietary photomask technology with ESD audit capabilities to determine the cause of ESD damage to photomasks, while also finding ways to reduce static energy. A thorough approach targets the cleanroom, lithography module, inspection modules, reticle stocker areas and photomask supply house.

In the fab, charge levels can be reduced by elevating room humidity levels, if possible. Next, engineers should ground all isolated conductors and static-dissipative insulators including process tools, tables and operator gowns. Then the engineer sizes, specifies and installs ionizers in ceilings, stocker areas and transport modules. Tool lock-up issues can be diagnosed using a digital oscilloscope and a wideband loop antenna inserted inside the tool.


Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

SPONSORED LINKS



 
Advertisement
SPONSORED LINKS

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Videos

Blogs

  • David Lammers
    Views on News

    October 23, 2008
    When Is No Really a No?
    An executive at a major IC manufacturer likes to tell the story about a meeting in 1996 to discuss 3...
    More
  • Aaron Hand
    The Fine Print

    August 13, 2008
    Making All Lithography Look Impossible
    For the SEMICON West Daily News, I reported on the Tuesday afternoon Device Scaling TechXPOT...
    More
  • » VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Podcasts

Videos

Advertisements





NEWSLETTERS
Plug in and get the latest SI news, trends and industry updates delivered free, directly to your inbox!

SI NewsBreak and Special Reports (Weekdays)
Wafer Processing Report (Monthly)
Lithography Report (Monthly)
Metrology Report (Monthly)
Clean Processing Report (Monthly)
Packaging Report (Twice Monthly)
©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites